# Fully Accepting Pythagorean Diet

> If, however, some one should, nevertheless, think it is unjust
> to destroy brutes, such a one should neither use milk, nor wool,
> nor sheep, nor honey. For, as you injure a man by taking from
> him his garments, thus, also, you injure a sheep by shearing it.
> For the wool which you take from it is its vestment. Milk,
> likewise, was not produced for you, but for the young of the
> animal that has it. The bee also collects honey as food for
> itself; which you, by taking away, administer to your own pleasure.
>
> Porphyry, "On Abstinence from Eating Animals"



A lot of humans are no better than animals. But I don't think they
don't deserve rights. Instead humans and animals both share animal
rights.

Therefore I have concluded that if it is bad to do with humans, it
is bad to do with animals. For example it is bad to impregnate and
lactate a woman to gather human milk. So dairy is bad. That's way
more barbaric than simple hunting.

Though I don't like modern veganism. I'm rather inclined to
Pythagoreanism. So I'm against beans too. But that's another matter.